EPSTEIN
page 14 / 354 . OCR, unverified
An: Nicole Junkermann I Junkermanngroup
Betreff: Re: Bin Ennakhil
no
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Nicole Junkermann I J unkermann group
wrote:
Wowl Did you not get my response?
Von: jeffrey E. Imailto:jeevacation@gmail.com
Gesendet: dimanche 5 avril 2015 18:49
An: Nicole Junkermann I Junkermanngroup
Betreff: Fwd: Bin Ennakhil
Forwarded message --------
From: Mark Lloyd <I
Date: Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:06 AM
Subject: Fwd: Bin Ennakhil
To: Jeffrey Epstein # <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Kensington"
Date: 26 February 2015 07:59:32 WET
To:
Cc:
Subject: Bin Ennakhil
Pictures and description of Bin Ennakhil
Marc LEON
Managing Director
KENSINGTON
Finest Properties Marrakech Sariau
License partner of KENSINGTON
Finest Properties International
EFTA00644807
--- PAGE 2 ---
Exclusive affiliate of
CHRISTIE'S International Real Estate
Private Office Marrakech
Avenue Yacoub El Mansour
Arset Bata 3, App. 13, 50 et.
Gueliz - 40000 - Marrakech (Morocco)
www.kensington-morocco.com
EFTA00644808
--- PAGE 3 ---
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
TEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to
, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
EFTA00644809
--- PAGE 4 ---
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to
and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00644810
--- SOURCE: 0216__EFTA00644811.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: 0216
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00644811.pdf
----------------------------------------
From: Boris Nikolic
To: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: FW:
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 01:37:05 +0000
Inline-Images: image001.gif
I will try tmr.
Just now closing door of my plane
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: 4/8/2015 9:34 PM
To: Boris Nikolic
Subject: Re: FW:
ask if i can talk to peter , don;t get emotional
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Boris Nikolic <
> wrote:
I asked. He is refusing.
He is even refusing talking to me.
And he said nasty stuff about you - stating that he would never even talk to low life as you and how I was careless to
whom I associate myself withl III
How bizzare and paradoxical this isIll I
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: jeffrey E.
Sent: 4/8/2015 9:25 PM
To: Boris Nikolic
Subject: Re: FW:
my suggestion is that i talk directly to david, this is silly and unproductive
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Boris Nikolic
What would you do?
From: jeffrey E. [mailto:jeevacation@gmail cam
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 5:13 PM
To: Boris Nikolic
Subject: Re: FW:
no,
> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Boris Nikolic
> wrote:
EFTA00644811
--- PAGE 2 ---
FYI
Please let me know what do you think.
B
From: Steve R. Ray [mailto:
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:50 PM
To: Boris Nikolic
Cc: Bennett L. Yee
Subject: RE:
Hi Boris,
Peter seemed to think that something less than 50% would be acceptable from David's standpoint. I asked
him to discuss 1/3 or some other percentage with David, and to see whether we would have to provide
some other consideration to balance the fact that David would be getting less than 50%. Peter called back
later with an interesting alternative proposal. What if 90% of each investment was treated as though
warehoused, and then was transferred into Biosys as originally intended. Investor capital would be used
to repay 90% of the loan from Gates. You, personally, would fund the remaining 10% of the cost outside
the Fund. In a liquidity event, you would be entitled to get your investment back first and David would
then receive any profit. David's profit would equate to his interest in carry on those 2 deals, but we
wouldn't have to deal with the GP carry issues that we had been attempting to address. You would be out
of pocket $400k up front, but most of Blue Talon and Digisite would go into Biosys. David wouldn't
have an interest in the Fund, and would only be entitled to upside after you had been repaid your $400k.
What do you think?
Steve
Steve R. Ray
GD GUNDERSON DETTMER
Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian, LLP